Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
In his famous dissent in Lawrence v. Texas, the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas’ same-sex sodomy law, Justice Antonin Scalia railed against the legal profession for embracing the “anti-antihomosexual culture.” Well, Scalia got that right. Not only are the nation’s elite law firms not anti-gay, they are putting out the lavender welcome mat. Perks that seemed radical just 10 years ago are now standard fare at Am Law 200 firms: health-care benefits for domestic partners, nondiscrimination pledges, and sponsorship of gay organizations. Firms are also stampeding to recruit candidates at gay job fairs. And according to a survey by gay-rights organization Human Rights Campaign, the legal profession ranks high in gay-friendliness when compared to other industries. All that good news makes the recent lawsuit against Sullivan & Cromwell for sexual orientation discrimination especially ironic. With 11 gay partners, S&C has become a mecca for gay lawyers. Though S&C’s numbers are striking — particularly for a Wall Street firm — we found progress across the board. Cravath, Swaine & Moore, arguably the most elite of elite New York firms, now counts five openly gay partners in its club of 87. And it’s not just New York or California; gays are making strides across the country. Houston’s Vinson & Elkins has five gay partners, while Atlanta’s Alston & Bird has seven, and Chicago’s Sidley Austin has six. “Yes, this is a red state, and the state of George W. Bush,” says Vinson & Elkins counsel Christopher Bacon, who’s active in the gay bar association. “But when you deal with urban areas, you won’t find that much difference from Boston or New York.” No wonder gay lawyers sound ebullient. “It used to be the love that dare not speak its name,” says Morrison & Foerster managing partner Keith Wetmore about being gay in firms. “Now it’s the love that cannot keep its mouth shut.” Wetmore, who joined Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco as an openly gay associate in 1982, says that these days, being gay is neither a liability nor a novelty. “There are so many of us that we don’t have to like each other,” says Wetmore. BELOW THE RADAR But despite the gay-friendly policies and the visibility of gays at elite firms, the actual percentage of openly gay lawyers reported by firms is low. According to the National Association for Law Placement, member firms report only 1.4 percent of lawyers as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered. NALP executive director James Leipold speculates that the number of gays in the profession is much higher, citing studies that show homosexuals constitute 3 percent to 7 percent of the general population. Truth is, despite the profession’s public embrace of diversity, neither firms nor individuals are completely at ease about the issue of sexual identity. “Don’t ask, don’t tell” remains an unspoken credo. One reason that accurate data are hard to collect is that GLBT individuals can stay below the radar screen. “It’s not obvious; I don’t sing �YMCA’ when I walk into a room,” says Joseph Hall, 43, the only openly gay partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell. Unlike gender or race, revealing sexual orientation is a matter of choice. For lawyers who entered the profession in the 1980s or before, the initial choice was to keep quiet. Sullivan & Cromwell’s Donald Toumey, 50, the firm’s first openly gay partner, says he kept his sexuality under wraps until he was a second-year partner. Conservative personally and politically — “I’m a card-carrying member of the Federalist Society” — Toumey says that he didn’t come out before because he was “risk-averse.” Even afterward, Toumey says, other gay lawyers at S&C remained cautious. Toumey recalls that the firm’s first gay lawyers meeting was held off-premises, because “people were concerned that other people would be checking who would show up.” While gays were well accepted at California firms by the 1980s, New York lagged behind. Weil, Gotshal & Manges banking partner Daniel Dokos says he first came out as a MoFo associate in San Francisco in the early 1980s. (He credits MoFo’s Wetmore, then a third-year associate, for “bringing me out of the closet.”) But he retreated to the closet once he moved to Sidley’s New York office in 1985. At that time, he says, New York was “more buttoned-up.” Tired of being closeted — “People thought I was a loner who took interesting vacations” — he decided to “make a statement” as a senior associate by bringing his boyfriend to Sidley’s Christmas party. He made partner at Sidley the next year. By the time he moved to Weil in 1998, he says, being gay was a nonissue. CLIENT CONFIDENTIAL That’s not always true in client relations. Even now, Dokos says there are awkward situations where he wonders if he should reveal his sexual identity to new clients. “As much as you want to think you’re cool about being open, you realize you’re not,” says Dokos. Other gay lawyers agree that coming out to colleagues is easier than coming out to clients. Bryan Cave partner William Hibsher, 63, who also chairs a gay partners group in New York, says that when he senses clients might not be comfortable with his sexuality, he becomes “less than authentic.” He adds, “That doesn’t mean I talk about my wife and kiddies. The difference is that your colleagues know the rules of the institution; clients aren’t functioning under the same rules.” But Hibsher says the big change is that clients are also increasingly identifying themselves as gay. Indeed, the emphasis placed on diversity by clients is putting pressure on firms to collect better statistics on gay lawyers. Dokos says firms need to be proactive about data collection. What doesn’t work, warns Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner Joseph Evall, who’s vice chairman of the firm’s GLBT initiative, is tiptoeing around the subject. That, in a sense, describes the experience of Debevoise & Plimpton. Though it’s been known for decades as a bastion of gay tolerance, Debevoise didn’t collect detailed data about its GLBT population until three years ago. In the past, says Jennifer Foster, the firm’s director of attorney development, the firm would give only a response of “10-plus partners and associates” to questions about its GLBT lawyers. “Originally, we wanted to protect privacy,” she says. Prodded by clients on diversity information, and after consulting with the firm’s associates and diversity committees, Debevoise changed course and lobbied actively for lawyers to fill in sexual orientation information. The result, says Foster, was a 200 percent increase in the number of reported gay lawyers. (There are now 29, including five partners.) Foster adds, “We do know there are others,” but says that “we respect their right” not to identify themselves. But to the generation of lawyers who grew up with GLBT affinity groups and gay recruiting parties, ambivalence about coming out is puzzling. Some young lawyers happily list GLBT memberships on their r�sum�. Kirkland & Ellis partner Edward Sadtler, a class of 1999 law graduate, says that listing membership in a gay group helps “distinguish you” from other candidates. “There is quite a bit of peer pressure not to be closeted,” says first-year Davis Polk associate Craig Phillips. “My generation has experienced less adversity.” Phillips, who took his boyfriend to a dinner when he interviewed at the firm, says that it’s refreshing that Davis Polk makes no special effort to recruit gays: “Davis Polk didn’t have these gay events, like going to a gay bar or club, and I liked that.” But does the fact that Davis Polk lists only one openly gay partner indicate that it’s behind the gay curve? Davis Polk partner Hall doesn’t think so; he says it’s “a statistical anomaly.” Hall adds, “We have a lot of gay associates here” but that the odds of making partner are daunting for everyone. As for giving gays more support, like the mentoring and affinity groups offered to women and minorities, Hall is skeptical: “It’s difficult to see what more needs to be done for white gay males who went to Ivy League schools and clerked.” To Hall and others, gays are doing just fine. Of course, many gays in the profession don’t agree. They emphasize that there are still vestiges of prejudice, and that the odyssey of coming out to colleagues, clients, and family is difficult. “No matter how many episodes of “Will & Grace” they watch,” Hibsher says, “there are people who will be shocked when some fourth-year associate tells them he’s gay . . . and that can lead to some rough edges.” That said, the progress made by gays in the profession is undeniable. Who knew Scalia could be so prescient?
Vivia Chen is a senior reporter for The American Lawyer , an ALM publication.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.