Appellant challenges the constitutionality of the Arlington city ordinance that justified the stop of appellant, as opposed to the driving while intoxicated statute under which he was convicted. The Rabb rule should not be applied to allow appellant to raise the constitutionality of the ordinance providing the justification for the police officer to stop appellant without first presenting the argument to the trial court.
August 28, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
Attorneys Solicitor General Division: The West Virginia Attorney General's Office is accepting applications for attorneys in the Solicitor...
Regional mid-sized firm with diverse civil litigation practice seeking hardworking and dedicated attorneys with 1-5 years experience for it...
Pond Lehocky Giordano LLP would like to announce that....
HARTMANN DOHERTY ROSA BERMAN & BULBULIA LLC's Matrimonial & Family Practice Warmly Welcomes the Honorable Peter J. Melchionne (Ret.) to Lead its New Family Law Dispute Resolution Team.
