The appellant contends the trial court had no subject matter jurisdiction to change the conservatorship arrangement set forth in its original decree of divorce. The appellant argues the trial court erred in denying two motions to recuse, failing to equalize the peremptory challenges given to each party, overruling an objection to evidence of racial bias, and awarding both appellee and the ad litem their attorney's fees. This court affirms.
May 23, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
General Counsel Conference addresses trends in regulatory, data protection, tech management, legal operations, and leadership.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated senior associate or counsel to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action grou...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a mid-level, highly motivated associate to join its dynamic and growing Employment, Labor, Ben...
Riker Danzig deeply mourns the passing of our esteemed partner, dear friend and beloved colleague, Marc D'Angiolillo.
