The court rejects the appellant's argument that the district court abused its discretion by prohibiting him from possessing "a firearm, destructive device, or any other dangerous weapon" while on supervised release. The appellant argued the term"other dangerous weaponis both impermissibly vague and overbroad.
January 24, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
COLE SCHOTZ P.C.LITIGATION PARALEGAL - FLORIDA OFFICE: Prominent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks a L...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
