Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Judges should toss aside their dictionaries when reviewing patent cases, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office told the U.S. Court of Appeals on Monday. In an amicus curiae brief filed that could affect how patents are interpreted, the PTO said the court instead should analyze terminology within the context of the patent application itself. "Because there is no standard dictionary used to define terms, parties construing patents can pick and choose among hundreds," said brief author Mark Lemley.
September 22, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS