Because the appellant failed to produce any summary judgment evidence establishing that he did not earn the potential qui tam fee during marriage, appellant's interest in the fee was community property and was properly subject to division by the trial court as part of the divorce.
August 30, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Looking for an Associate Attorney with 2 to 5 years experience to handle Labor and Employment Law, Pension Appeals and Workers Compensation....
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Regional mid-sized firm with diverse civil litigation practice seeking hardworking and dedicated attorneys with 1-5 years experience for it...
Lawyers of Distinction would like to announce...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
