X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46925 Judge Casey NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION providing prenatal services and individual physicians challenged the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, which bans the procedure called “partial-birth abortion” unless deemed necessary to protect a woman’s life. The court refused to declare the law unconstitutional and denied summary judgment to plaintiffs, who contended that the law makes no exception for the mother’s health. Plaintiffs also challenged the law as vague, an undue burden on the right to reproductive choice and a violation of women’s right to equal protection under the law. The court found a genuine issue of fact as to whether a partial-birth abortion is ever medically necessary to protect a woman’s health. The court based its ruling on the grounds that the state law lacked a maternal health exception and that it placed an undue burden on reproductive choice by banning the procedure used for second-trimester abortions.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.