Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Relying on a little-known, 74-year-old opinion, the Sixth District Court of Appeal recently held that contractual venue-selection clauses cannot be enforced to the extent that they conflict with California's venue statutes. In Alexander v. Superior Court ,the court declined to enforce the venue-selection clause. On review, the court of appeals held that the trial courts wrongly relied on the venue-selection clauses in deciding motions to transfer venue -- noting a distinction between venue and forum.
January 28, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS