Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Shelley Wessels leaned against a warehouse wall, watching intently as one of her accomplices picked the door locks. After several minutes the bolt finally clicked free, and Wessels and her team stormed the Livermore, Calif., building. Their mission: to find and seize a treasure trove of counterfeit circuit boards. Wessels, a partner at Fish & Richardson’s Menlo Park, Calif., office, had been hired by Adaptec Inc. to track down phony versions of its boards and get them off the market. Like a master thief in a Hollywood heist flick, she had assembled a crackerjack crew for the operation. A locksmith, two computer experts, a pair of private investigators, a couple of U.S. marshals, and a crew of legal assistants joined Wessels on the Livermore job. “I thought to myself, ‘I can’t believe I’m here doing this,’ ” Wessels recalls. “ It’s like you’re a kid in a candy store. It’s so different than what we normally do.” And like in an episode of “Law & Order,” Wessels says she was able to secure a warrant and obtain evidence directly. “It’s cool,” she says. “You tell yourself, ‘I get to go in and take care of this now.’ “ Detective work for intellectual property lawyers usually consists of taking depositions and poring through hundreds of thousands of pages of documents. When a counterfeit case does come along, litigators don’t often conduct a seizure. For one thing, it’s difficult to get a warrant since lawyers must be able to convince a judge they’re likely to find evidence of counterfeiting at the site. Wessels had conducted one seizure operation, also for Adaptec, in a previous case and had not expected to get a shot at another. This time around, Wessels and her crew hit the jackpot. Several circuit boards were laid out on tables and a couple of thousand more were piled in boxes throughout the warehouse. The team spent the day labeling the goods and going through file cabinets and computer hard drives, taking photographs, and videotaping the search. Then they loaded the counterfeit merchandise onto a truck and hauled it away. It was one of six sites Wessels and her colleagues searched that day in October 2000. Associate Katherine Horvath led a mission in Denver that garnered about 10 boards, while the others took place in California. The captured goods nailed the case for Wessels. Last month, a jury in San Jose federal court found one of the distributors guilty of trademark and copyright infringement and false designation of origin. “They’d given us no discovery,” Wessels says. “We put together a case based on what we found in the seizures.” COUNTERFEIT CULTURE Adaptec learned that counterfeit versions of its SCSI (pronounced “scuzzy”) boards were on the market after customers called in complaining of defective purchases. Many of the boards either had no serial numbers or phony ones. For Adaptec, the counterfeit operation meant a loss of millions of dollars in sales and a potential blow to its reputation. The boards, which transfer data between a computer and peripheral components, retail for $200 to $300 apiece. Wessels found about 20 individuals and companies distributing phony boards. Most settled or defaulted out of the case, so only one defendant went to trial. While the seizure operation provided television moments � in the Denver sweep, U.S. marshals had Horvath hide behind a van while they secured the site and confiscated a gun � Wessels says the trial was memorable also. In response to Wessels’ request for an expedited jury trial, Judge James Ware of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ordered each side to present its case in four hours. Ware had granted summary judgment that the seized circuit boards were counterfeit, so the jury had only to decide if the defendant, Jun Liang, vice president of Unisun Inc., was liable. Liang, who lives in Beijing, claimed she wasn’t working at the company when it sold the phony Adaptec boards. But Wessels had a smoking gun � a notebook in which Liang had scribbled the words “fake,” “counterfeit,” and “no S/N” (for “no serial number”). “We marched her through this notebook and established the dates in which she made entries,” Wessels says. “She would volunteer excuses that made her look worse.” Despite the jury verdict, Liang’s attorney, Daniel Mason, a partner at San Francisco’s Zelle, Hofmann, Voelbel, Mason & Gette, says the case is far from over. “Nothing is decided on damages, if there are any,” Mason says. Liang retained Mason, who has affiliate offices in Beijing, on the eve of the trial. Wessels’ team also flew in a private investigator Adaptec had hired in Asia. A former New York City cop based in Hong Kong, the detective had set up a fictitious company to purchase suspect boards. He testified about Unisun’s network of operations in Asia and the United States. The court has yet to determine the damages in the case. But Adaptec may have difficulty collecting, at least for a while. Wessels says that as far as she can tell Liang is no longer operating in the United States. If she returns, though, she’ll have to pay up. In the meantime, Wessels and her team are thrilled they shut down the counterfeit scam and had their day in the field. “It’s a great war story case,” Wessels says. Brenda Sandburg is a reporter at The Recorder, the American Lawyer Media newspaper in San Francisco, where this article first appeared.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.