Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
GORDON & REES OPENS OFFICE IN HOUSTON Gordon & Rees has moved into the Lone Star State with the opening of a small satellite office in Houston. The firm launched the office earlier this month with a trio of recently hired solo attorneys from the region. The team comprises Donna Smith Cude, a labor and employment law attorney who will head the Houston office, and litigators Lucinda Stanford and Sloane Underwood. According to Gordon & Rees, Sloane represents energy and chemical companies in personal and property injury suits. Houston is home to a number of large energy companies, including Dynegy Inc. and El Paso Corp. In January, Pillsbury Winthrop launched a Houston office. For San Francisco-based Gordon & Rees, the Houston outpost is the firm’s eighth office. — Alexei Oreskovic FEN-PHEN SETTLEMENT TRUST SUES FOR FRAUD PHILADELPHIA — A second doctor was accused of fraud last week in a federal lawsuit filed by the AHP Settlement Trust, the entity created to process claims related to the $3.75 billion fen-phen settlement. Attorneys Richard Scheff and Jeremy Mishkin of Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads filed the suit against New York City cardiologist Richard Mueller alleging that he intentionally defrauded the trust by certifying medically unreasonable claims. The suit alleges that Mueller conspired with an unnamed law firm to submit fraudulent claims “in order to earn substantial additional fees being offered by the law firm in exchange for VHD [valvular heart disease] certifications.” The trust alleges that, as a result of Mueller’s actions, millions of dollars were paid to fen-phen claimants without VHD, while payment to legitimate claimants was delayed. In September, the trust filed a civil RICO suit against Dr. Linda Crouse, a Kansas City, Mo., cardiologist, alleging that she defrauded the trust by “certifying that thousands of [fen-phen] claimants had serious valvular heart disease when either she knew that they did not or had no reasonable basis for certifying that they did.” Crouse was first targeted by the trust last year when a team of lawyers from Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen successfully moved to block payment of all claims connected with two law firms and two of the doctors they had used. At the time, U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle III said he was forced to issue an injunction because the settlement funds were set aside for “rightful claimants who suffered from fen-phen and not as a pot of gold for lawyers, physicians and non-qualifying claimants.” — The Legal Intelligencer

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.