X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Below are cases coming before the Supreme Court in the coming weeks and the lawyers who will argue them. “Docket Watch” appears at the beginning of each two-week argument cycle when the high court hears cases. MONDAY, NOV. 3 Andrew J. Kontrick v. Robert A. Ryan No. 02-819 Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. Question presented: Whether Bankruptcy Rule 4004′s 60-day deadline for objecting to a debtor’s discharge is jurisdictional, and therefore unwaivable. For petitioner: E. King Poor, Winston & Strawn, Chicago; and Kent Jones, assistant to the solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondent: James Figliulo, Figliulo & Silverman, Chicago. Maryland v. Joseph Jermaine Pringle No. 02-809 Certiorari to the Maryland Court of Appeals. Question presented: Whether Fourth Amendment bars arrest of occupants of car where drugs, cash are found and all deny ownership. Pringle claims confession should be suppressed because arrest was illegal. For petitioner: Gary Bair, assistant Maryland attorney general, Baltimore; and Sri Srinivasan, assistant to the solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondent: Nancy Forster, Maryland deputy public defender, Baltimore. TUESDAY, NOV. 4 Jeff Groh v. Joseph R. Ramirez, et al. No. 02-811 Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Question presented: Whether officers violate Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement when executing search warrant based on attached affidavit of items to be searched, but not including same level of detail. For petitioner: Richard Cordray, Kirkland & Ellis, Washington, D.C.; and Austin Schlick, assistant to the solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondents: Vince Kozakiewicz, Kozakiewicz Law Office, Boise, Idaho. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles E. Edwards No. 02-1196 Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. Question presented: Whether investment scheme is excluded as “investment contract” under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for promise of fixed, not variable return. For petitioner: Theodore Olson, solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. For respondent: Michael Wolensky, Kutak Rock, Atlanta. WEDNESDAY, NOV. 5 Illinois v. Robert S. Lidster No. 02-1060 Certiorari to the Illinois Supreme Court. Question presented: Whether Indianapolis v. Edmond bars officers from arresting motorists for drunk driving, while at checkpoint investigating another offense. For petitioner: Gary Feinerman, solicitor general of Illinois, Chicago; and Patricia Millett, assistant to the solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondent: Donald Ramsell, Ramsell & Armamentos, Wheaton, Ill. MONDAY, NOV. 10 John M. Lamie v. United States Trustee No. 02-693 Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. Whether Bankruptcy Code section on officer compensation authorizes fee award to Chapter 7 debtor’s attorney, if omission of “debtor’s attorney” was inadvertent. For petitioner: Thomas Goldstein, Goldstein & Howe, Washington, D.C. For respondent: Lisa Blatt, assistant to the solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. Michael D. Crawford v. State of Washington No. 02-9410 Certiorari to the Washington Supreme Court. Question presented: Whether Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause permits use of potential accomplice’s out-of-court statement, if parts of statement “interlock” with defendant’s. For petitioner: Jeffrey Fisher, Davis Wright Tremaine, Seattle. For respondent: John Jones, Washington senior deputy prosecuting attorney, Olympia, Wash. WEDNESDAY, NOV. 12 General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. v. Dennis Cline, et al. No. 02-1080 Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. Question presented: Whether Age Discrimination Employment Act of 1967 prohibits “reverse discrimination” policies that treat older workers more favorably than younger workers covered by the act. For petitioner: Donald Verrilli Jr., Jenner & Block, Washington, D.C. For respondent: Mark Biggerman, Buckley King, Cleveland; and Paul Clement, deputy solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). Olympia Airways v. Rubina Husain, et al. No. 02-1348 Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Question presented: Whether airline is liable under “accident” provision of Warsaw Convention when asthmatic passenger dies from cigarette smoke in aircraft, and flight attendant refuses to relocate passenger. For petitioner: Andrew Harakas, Condon & Forsyth, New York. For respondents: H. Bartow Farr III, Farr & Taranto, Washington, D.C.; and Barbara McDowell, assistant to the solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). � Shaina Jones

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.