Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
San Francisco-Dot-com jobs may have dried up, and a number of lawyers have scurried back to the relative safety of private firms. But corporate law departments in the Bay Area-particularly at the region’s Fortune 1,000 companies-are holding on to hundreds of lawyers they picked up during the tech boom of the late 1990s. In fact, five of the 10 largest in-house departments in California are Silicon Valley players-including the state’s biggest corporate legal team, the 300 lawyers at Hewlett-Packard Co. And even with a tough economy-particularly in the technology industry-don’t expect the numbers to shift downward any time soon. The sweeping corporate reforms contained in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are keeping in-house counsel in high demand. A poor economy means companies need legal advice on everything from laying off workers to coping with bankrupt vendors. And then there’s simple mathematics. Once a company reaches multibillion-dollar revenues it often finds it cheaper to keep lawyers inside to do routine work. “Most companies prefer to do things in-house and hire outside counsel when they need to,” said Bruce Sewell, Intel Corp.’s deputy general counsel. “It’s a financial issue so when companies have enough money to support an in-house group, [hiring lawyers] is the normal thing to do.” Sewell is part of the 196-lawyer team at Intel, the second-largest department in the Bay Area and third biggest at a California-based company behind Hewlett-Packard and the 270 attorneys at The Walt Disney Co. Keeping a big department is critical for a company that filed for 2,100 patents last year alone. Though much of the patent work is farmed out to private firms, in-house lawyers keep some for competitive reasons and career development. “It’s great day-to-day training,” Sewell said. “And so they’re not just managing outside relationships-it keeps them sharp.” Turbulence creates work Martha Africa, managing director of Major, Hagen & Africa, which places in-house counsel, said the economic downturn has caused less downsizing in legal departments than she expected. “The current turbulence some companies are experiencing is going to increase the amount of legal work the law department needs to handle rather than decrease it,” Africa said. “The fact you can’t afford the legal work doesn’t mean it’s going away.” Africa said legal departments can also predict how much their in-house lawyers will cost them each year-no small issue when companies are dealing with falling revenue and uncertainty about sales, stock prices and debt. Financial uncertainty isn’t the only unknown looming, of course. Sarbanes-Oxley has had many corporate lawyers in a state of perpetual panic since the law passed in July 2002. “With Sarbanes-Oxley and the entire corporate governance tidal wave, lawyers are becoming a much more integral part of the internal controls,” said Daniel Cooperman, general counsel of Oracle Corp. “You suddenly have high-level people paying attention to issues of what might be seen as mundane or questions that were way below their grade level,” Cooperman said. “It’s given lawyers much more prominent roles in corporate governance.” Large corporate departments are not only hanging on to their attorneys, they are still spending big bucks on outside counsel. Intel’s Sewell estimates that his department spends $75 million each year on outside counsel. Charles James, ChevronTexaco GC, spends more than $100 million annually. Still, James is looking for ways to tighten up his department. He took over as the new GC in December and is working on a host of administrative issues. “We’re working on our mix,” James said. “You look for circumstances where there is a critical mass of work that is recurring and look for ways to provide that in an economic way.” That’s not to say he’s looking to lay off lawyers-in fact, he may hire more. “It’s the scope of business that drives the growth,” James said. “And certainly as our society has become as litigious as it is, it drives growth.” Factors like greater government regulation and litigation are likely to determine how big his department will become.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.