X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER   In this civil action by the United States (the “Government”) seeking various forms of relief related to unpaid tax liabilities, Defendant Shaindy Lax (“Shaindy”) moves to dismiss all claims asserted against her pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (See ECF No. 96).1 For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied. BACKGROUND The following facts are alleged in the amended complaint (Am. Compl., ECF No. 106) and are viewed in the light most favorable to the Government. Familiarity with the extensive factual allegations contained in the amended complaint is presumed, and they are recited here only insofar as necessary to dispose of the pending motion. Chaim Lax (“Chaim”) was a diamond merchant and real estate developer who, through numerous business entities, owned parcels of real estate throughout Brooklyn, New York. (See id. 27). In or around November 2006, he was diagnosed with stomach cancer. (See id. 31). He died on or around November 3, 2008. (See id. 35). The executors of his estate (the “Estate”) are his son, Moshe Lax (“Moshe”), and his daughter, Zlaty Schwartz (“Zlaty”). (See id. 37). In addition, Moshe and Zlaty are the trustees of the Lax Family Trust (the “Trust”), an irrevocable trust Chaim had established in 2003, of which Chaim’s children (including Moshe and Zlaty) and grandchildren are beneficiaries. (See id.

61-62). Shaindy is Moshe’s wife. (See id. 74). Moshe and Zlaty have been named as Defendants in this action, in addition to Shaindy and numerous other individuals and business entities. Prior to his death, Chaim knew that he was being audited by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and that he owed substantial income taxes. (See id. 258). He also knew that his Estate would owe substantial estate taxes following his death. (See id.). The Government alleges that, “[k]nowing of his negative health prognosis, and that he owed millions in income taxes and would owe millions more upon his death, Chaim undertook a series of sham transactions designed to shield his assets from collection by the Internal Revenue Service.” (Id. 32). The Government further alleges that Moshe and Zlaty “continued that effort after his death in order to avoid paying the taxes he owed.” (Id.). As of April 25, 2018, the Estate had unpaid federal tax liabilities of over $60 million. (See id. 41). In this action, the Government seeks various forms of relief related to these unpaid tax liabilities. As relevant to the pending motion, the Government asserts that Moshe and Zlaty orchestrated a series of sham transactions to hide the Estate’s assets from the IRS by conveying them to assorted business entities held in Shaindy’s name. The Government describes three such schemes in the amended complaint, denoted as “Scheme 2″, “Scheme 3″, and “Scheme 4″. Scheme 2 was essentially a continuation of an earlier scheme, denoted as “Scheme 1″. The Government alleges that each of these Schemes “was part of a series of transfers…designed…to place Chaim’s assets beyond the reach of his creditors, including the IRS.” (Id.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
April 29, 2024 - May 01, 2024
Aurora, CO

The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.


Learn More
May 15, 2024
Philadelphia, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.


Learn More

Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...


Apply Now ›

Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...


Apply Now ›

Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...


Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/08/2024
Daily Report

Daily Report 1/2 Page Professional Announcement 60 Days


View Announcement ›