Judicial privilege extended to witness in state professional board investigation where board performed quasi-judicial function and privilege necessary to encourage witness participation in contemplation of judicial proceeding. Order of the trial court affirmed.
May 26, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Defamation • Complaints to State Licensing Board • Judicial Privilege • IIED
Greenberg v. McGraw, PICS Case No. 17-0800 (Pa. Super. May 5, 2017) Bender, J. (28 pages).
Judicial privilege extended to witness in state professional board investigation where board performed quasi-judicial function and privilege necessary to encourage witness participation in contemplation of judicial proceeding. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
