X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The latest chapter in the Nevada federal court saga launched by aggressive copyright plaintiff Righthaven LLC is a concession by its affiliate, Las Vegas Review-Journal publisher Stephens Media, that a brief news article excerpt in an online forum is not copyright infringement. On Nov. 17, Stephens Media made the concession in its response to a summary judgment motion by Democratic Underground, a political Web site, in Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground the District of Nevada. According to Democratic Underground’s motion, Righthaven filed more than 200 copyright infringement cases in the District of Nevada claiming that Internet posters infringed copyrights assigned to it by Stephens Media. The cases sought statutory damages of up to $150,000, seizures of domain names and attorney fees. The case at hand began in August 2010, when Righthaven sued political discussion forum Democratic Underground and its principal, David Allen, for copyright infringement after a forum participant posted a five-sentence excerpt of a much longer news article copyrighted by Stephens Media. With pro bono help from the Electronic Frontier Foundation and law firms that work on EFF cases, Democratic Underground filed counterclaims against Righthaven affiliate Stephens Media in September 2010. In June 2011, District Judge Roger Hunt dismissed Righthaven for lack of standing. Hunt found that a strategic alliance agreement between Stephens Media and Righthaven did not grant Righthaven any of the exclusive rights under the 1976 Copyright Act required for standing to sue. In July, Hunt ordered Righthaven to pay $5,000 in sanctions for its “flagrant misrepresentation” to the court about its financial relationship with Stephens Media. Hunt denied Righthaven’s motion to intervene in the case in August. The following month, Righthaven filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Righthaven notified Hunt that it plans to appeal his dismissal of Righthaven’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and his ruling on Righthaven’s attempted intervention. On Oct. 24, Democratic Underground asked for summary judgment against counterclaim defendant Stephens Media. Democratic Underground argued that it had committed no “volitional act” that could underpin a claim for direct copyright infringement. It also claimed that the fair use doctrine, which allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission, mostly for creative, scholarship, teaching or similar uses, is a complete defense against the infringement claims at issue in the case. Stephens Media stated in its filing that “it does not contest the substantive arguments presented by [Democratic Underground] on the issues of volitional act and fair use as applied to the material facts of this case.” Stephens Media also asked the court to keep sealed commercial information submitted as part of Democratic Underground’s summary judgment motion. Stephens Media’s filing claims that it’s licensing agreements predate the lawsuit, are collateral to the case and “implicate the confidentiality and privacy rights of third parties that are not present before the Court and, thus, have no opportunity to be heard.” Laurence Pulgram, who is representing Democratic Underground pro bono, said that Stephens Media’s filing is a “strong affirmation by a very interested party” to the Righthaven litigation that it’s OK to excerpt articles on the Internet. Pulgram is the San Francisco managing partner for Fenwick & West and co-chairman of the firm’s IP and technology litigation practice. “Given the approach that Stevens [Media] and its agent Righthaven have taken of carpet-bombing bloggers and others who have included excerpts, hopefully, this will indicate that we’ll be getting to a more rational approach and a ceasefire,” Pulgram said. Las Vegas lawyer Chad Bower is also representing the Democratic Underground on the case. Stephens Media’s lawyers at Campbell & Williams in Las Vegas did not respond to requests for comment. Shawn Mangano, a Las Vegas solo practitioner and a Righthaven outside counsel, said that Righthaven contends that it is the actual holder of the works at issue in the case, and Stephens Media’s filing highlights its inability to effectively protect Righthaven’s interests. “It’s an interesting development, but it’s consistent with what we’ve believed all along, that Stephens Media is in a tough spot,” Mangano said. “It [also] gives Democratic Underground a free bite at the apple by [allowing it to assert a] noninfringement declaratory relief claim without facing the possibility of an infringement claim against it.” Sheri Qualters can be contacted at [email protected]

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.