The plaintiff in a putative securities class action against radio ratings company Arbitron Inc. must turn over the names of 11 confidential informants, a federal judge in Manhattan has ruled. Southern District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer ruled that the names of the informants were not protected by the attorney work product doctrine.
November 18, 2011 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The plaintiff in a putative securities class action against radio ratings company Arbitron Inc. must turn over the names of 11 confidential informants, a federal judge in Manhattan has ruled.
Southern District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer ruled on Nov. 14 in Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension-Annuity Trust Fund v. Arbitron Inc., 1:08-cv-04063, that the names of the informants were not protected by the attorney work product doctrine.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
