A Cherry Hill law firm has agreed to pay $137,656 to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it helped its client, a mortgage modification company, engage in unfair, abusive and deceptive marketing practices.
November 01, 2011 at 04:44 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
A Cherry Hill law firm has agreed to pay $137,656 to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it helped its client, a mortgage modification company, engage in unfair, abusive and deceptive marketing practices.
The federal suit, in Federal Trade Commission v. Hope Now Modifications, 1:09-cv-1204, was notable for the government’s attempt to hold a law firm liable, based on agency theory, for the actions of a client.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
