A federal judge has refused to dismiss the claim of a sex offender who is a self-described atheist that a mandated treatment program is unconstitutionally based on religious tenets contrary to his beliefs.

David McChesney’s pro se lawsuit alleging that the Sex Offender Treatment Program (SOTP) violates his First Amendment rights under the Establishment Clause should go forward, ruled Northern District Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]