In a ruling that may sound the death knell for bringing a medical monitoring suit as a class action, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to certify claims brought by residents of a small northern Illinois town who say they live in fear of contracting cancer due to chemical dumping from a Rohm & Haas plant.

“Because causation and medical necessity often require individual proof, medical monitoring classes may founder for lack of cohesion,” U.S. Circuit Judge Anthony J. Scirica wrote in Gates v. Rohm & Haas .

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]