SAN FRANCISCO — A California appeal court wiped out a defense verdict in an employment discrimination case against a Bakersfield lawyer Tuesday, saying the trial court should have admitted “me too” evidence of the lawyer’s alleged racial and gender bias.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal panel ruled that not allowing the jury to hear certain evidence — which painted a picture of a foul-mouthed lawyer who berated and harassed female support staff — was prejudicial to the plaintiff.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]