A woman who contrary to her religious beliefs received a life-saving blood transfusion after having a baby has no medical malpractice claim against the Staten Island hospital where she received the blood or the doctor who treated her, a state judge has ruled.

Supreme Court Justice Joseph J. Maltese in Richmond County (See Profile) ruled last week in DiGeronimo v. Fuchs, 101540/06, that Nancy DiGeronimo, a Jehovah’s Witness, was essentially trying to bring a “wrongful life” claim against Dr. Allen Fuchs, who gave her prenatal care, and the Staten Island University Hospital, his employer, where she had her baby.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]