A late-night conversation between the owner of a karaoke bar and an attorney about prospective representation is not enough to disqualify the lawyer from representing a plaintiff in a suit against the owner, the state Supreme Court rules.
May 25, 2011 at 07:43 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
A late-night conversation between the owner of a karaoke bar and an attorney about prospective representation is not enough to disqualify the lawyer from representing a plaintiff in a suit against the owner, the state Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday.
The 4-3 ruling, in O Builders & Associates v. Yuna Corp., A-34-10, clarifies the standards that must be met when one party seeks to disqualify another party’s lawyer.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
