SAN FRANCISCO — Bolstering the duty of loyalty that lawyers owe former clients, the California Supreme Court today ruled against a lawyer who took a public position against an ex-client’s hotel development project.

The unanimous court didn’t articulate a broad new rule about the duty of loyalty, and tried to tamp down worries about what the decision could mean for law firms’ disqualification rules and lawyers’ freedom of speech.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]