A state appeals court on Monday reversed denial of post-conviction relief to an ex-client of Paul Bergrin, a lawyer who now faces criminal charges himself, finding public defenders appointed afterwards failed to inquire beyond his tactical decision to forgo a motion to suppress drug evidence.

“The possibility that Bergrin made a tactical decision did not absolve the attorneys representing defendant post-conviction of their respective obligations to advance defendant’s arguments,” the panel wrote in remanding the case, State v. Cyrus, A-3068-08, to allow the filing of a new petition for relief.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]