The New Jersey Supreme Court has agreed to look at how far personal injury lawyers can go, in their closing statements, to convey to jurors the gravity of their clients’ injuries.

At issue in Risko v. Thompson Muller Automotive Group t/a Hammonton Chrysler Jeep Dodge, A-27-10, is whether a lawyer stepped over the line in equating a decedent’s suffering with torture and in telling the jury that they would be “ignoring the law” if they had an issue with “a million dollar case.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]