In the Bratz versus Barbie battle, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday tweaked its earlier opinion in a way the winning side says is the court’s pre-emptive strike at thwarting U.S. Supreme Court review.

In the amended opinion, the court says applying the “substantial similarity” test in deciding who owns the Bratz doll doesn’t create a circuit split.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]