Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Cressman Tubular Products Corp. v. Kurt Wiseman Oil & Gas, Ltd.

Houston's 14th Court of Appeals concluded that the plaintiffs' express-warranty claim against appellant sounds in contract, but their implied-warranty claims against the cross-appellees sound in tort; thus, the trial court did not err in disregarding the proportionate-responsibility finding as to the express-warranty claim against one defendant and in refusing to disregard a similar finding as to the implied-warranty claims against two other defendants. The 14th Court further concluded that the trial court did not err in refusing to include alternative bases for its judgment. Houston's 14th Court of Appeals, No. 14-08-01039-CV, 09-24-2010

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Affirmed and Opinion filed September 23, 2010.

OPINION

This is a double appeal of a case in which multiple theories of liability were asserted against four defendants for damages caused by the sale of goods for use in an oil well. After the defendant found liable for 99% of the plaintiffs’ damages filed for bankruptcy protection, the trial court severed those claims from this case and entered judgment requiring all of the plaintiffs’ damages and attorney’s fees to be paid by the defendant that the jury found to be 1% responsible. On appeal, that defendant contends that all of the plaintiffs’ damages sound in tort, and thus, the trial court erred in disregarding a jury finding allocating responsibility for breach of an express warranty and in awarding attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs argue that all of their damages sound in contract, and they contend that the trial court erred in failing to disregard the jury’s finding allocating responsibility for breach of implied warranties, failing to hold the defendants jointly and severally liable, and failing to include the jury’s breach-of-contract finding as an alternative basis for the judgment against one of the defendants. We conclude that the plaintiffs’ express-warranty claim against appellant sounds in contract, but their implied-warranty claims against the cross-appellees sound in tort; thus, the trial court did not err in disregarding the proportionate-responsibility finding as to the express warranty claim against one defendant and in refusing to disregard a similar finding as to the implied warranty claims against two other defendants. Finally, we further conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to include alternative bases for its judgment, and we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center

Pennsylvania Legal Awards (PALA) 2023

June 14, 2023
TBC, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.


Learn More

Consulting Top Consultants 2023

June 15, 2023
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.


Learn More

Southeastern Legal Awards (SLA) 2023

June 22, 2023
TBC

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts

COMMERCIAL FINANCE ATTORNEY - CT OFFICES; REMOTE will be considered


We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...


Apply Now ›

LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEY - NEW YORK


AV-rated Garden City, NY law firm seeks attorney with 5+ years' experience for firm's labor & employment department. Prior experience ne...


Apply Now ›

Trusts and Estates Associate Milford, CT


The Law Offices of Charles L. Kurmay seeks an associate attorney. While we have locations in Milford, and Madison, CT, and a presence in the...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs

LAWYERS OF DISTINCTION

05/25/2023
NLJ Web

Lawyers of Distinction would like to announce...


View Announcement ›

DAVIS, SAPERSTEIN & SALOMON, P.C.

05/08/2023
NJLJ Web

It is our privilege & honor to announce the addition of Steven H. Cohen, Patricia Z. Boguslawski, Evan D. Baker & Kelly A. Conlon as new partners of DAVIS, SAPERSTEIN & SALOMON, P.C.


View Announcement ›

FERRO LABELLA & WEISS LLC

05/08/2023
NJLJ Web

FERRO LABELLA & WEISS LLC would like to announce that....


View Announcement ›
Go to Professional Announcements

Legal Newswire

New Legal Powerhouse, Trucking Injury Law Group, Launched by Trio of Esteemed Pe...
Kathryn Murphy and Lindsey Obenhaus honored by D Magazine as Best Lawyers in Dal...
BRADLEY LAUNCHES ATLANTA OFFICE
SEDA Experts Expands its Capital Markets and Asset Management Expert Witness Pra...
Submit a press release