Dimitrios Biller will be able to introduce documents in his arbitration against his former employer, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., that the company had claimed were privileged. And if that news weren’t bad enough for the car manufacturer, a plaintiffs lawyer in Texas thinks the ruling may influence the judge in his case to allow the same documents into his contempt proceeding.
In a long-awaited ruling, the California arbitrator said on Thursday that Biller had made a prima facie showing that the documents, which ordinarily would not be available for him to use in discovery or during the arbitration hearing, qualify under the “crime-fraud” exception.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]