Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A federal judge has ruled that policy that prohibits openly homosexual members from serving in the U.S. military is unconstitutional. U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge Virginia Phillips in Riverside, Calif., issued her ruling late Thursday in Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America, about two months after the Log Cabin Republicans went to trial against the U.S. government seeking to strike down the 1993 statute. “The Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Act infringes the fundamental rights of United States servicemembers in many ways,” Phillips wrote in an 86-page opinion. “In order to justify the encroachment on these rights, Defendants faced the burden at trial of showing the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Act was necessary to significantly further the Government’s important interests in military readiness and unit cohesion. Defendants failed to meet that burden.” Phillips found that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell impeded both the Fifth and First Amendment rights of homosexuals and granted a permanent injunction barring enforcement of the law. “We are delighted with the court’s ruling in favor of Log Cabin Republicans in this important case,” said Dan Woods, a partner at White & Case’s Los Angeles office who represents Log Cabin Republicans, in a prepared statement. “This is a major victory in the fight for equality and means that military service will be available to all Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation.” A U.S. government official could not be reached for comment by press time. Phillips cited President Obama’s statements that the policy “doesn’t contribute to our national security” and actually “weakens our national security.” She also found that Log Cabin Republicans had established standing to bring the suit, rejecting a key defense for the U.S. government in the case. The policy forbids gays and lesbians from openly serving in the armed forces. Congress is weighing a proposal to eliminate the ban.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.