Patent practitioners say that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s recent decision that whistleblowers have standing to sue companies that falsely label their products as covered by patents probably won’t save cases that are filed based on the bare fact that products contain false markings.

The Federal Circuit’s Aug. 31 unanimous panel ruling in Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers Inc. reversed a Southern District of New York decision that Raymond Stauffer, a pro se litigant and patent attorney in Chatham, N.J., did not have standing to sue Brooks Brothers for making adjustable bow ties that are marked with expired patent numbers.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]