Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Law firm partners. Judges. Law professors. You can add another category to the list of legal jobs in which women are underrepresented: top law review editors. A survey of law reviews found that women account for 44 percent of staffers but only 33 percent of editors-in-chief. Ms. JD, a non-profit organization that seeks to advance women in the legal profession, surveyed general interest law review staffs at the top 50 law schools, as ranked by U.S. News & World Report. The organization looked at the 2008 and 2009 academic years. The survey focused on law reviews to gauge women’s leadership and achievement in law schools, said Ms. JD executive director Jessie Kornberg. “Rightly or wrongly, law review membership — law review leadership in particular — is seen as an important indicator in the most competitive job markets, including clerkships and academia,” Kornberg said. Some of the survey results were encouraging, Kornberg said. For instance, women accounted for 46 percent of those with leadership positions at law reviews, roughly equivalent to the percentage of women law graduates during the survey period. This should help position women for the most competitive jobs, Kornberg said. But the dearth of women editors-in-chief signals a problem, she said. “There is obviously some lingering glass ceiling when it comes to the highly coveted editor-in-chief position,” Kornberg said. “There is an adequate pipeline of women on law review staff to achieve better parity here. Some other force is at work.” The gender breakdowns of law review staffs did not vary significantly by law school ranking, the survey found. This is the first Ms. JD survey of law review staffs, and the group plans to expand the survey during the new academic year to look at the representation of minority women and examine how staff and leadership positions are selected. “We hope this gender diversity data will contribute to a broader dialogue about women’s experiences in law school and the extent to which the intersection of gender and the law school experience may contribute to the disparities evident in later stages of women’s legal careers,” the report reads.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.