Manatt, Phelps & Phillips on Wednesday lost its bid to have the California Supreme Court review a malicious prosecution lawsuit filed against the firm over Franklin Mint's line of Princess Diana collectibles. In May, an appeals court reinstated the suit, finding that Manatt had no probable cause to bring trademark dilution or false advertising claims against Franklin on behalf of the firm's clients, the late princess's estate and The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund.
July 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips on Wednesday lost its bid to have the California Supreme Court review a malicious prosecution lawsuit filed against the firm over Franklin Mint’s line of Princess Diana collectibles.
Only one justice, Carlos Moreno, would have voted to grant the petition.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
