In 2005, the D.C. Circuit ruled that the Federal Trade Commission could not force lawyers to comply with new rules about privacy notifications. But the agency argued on Wednesday that decision should not restrict the court as it takes up another set of regulations that could bind lawyers. The FTC made the argument in a case about a rule designed to push creditors to prevent identity theft -- known as the "red flags" rule.
July 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday urged a federal appeals court not to exempt lawyers from generally applicable business regulations again.
In 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the FTC could not force lawyers to comply with new rules about privacy notifications. But the agency said on Wednesday that decision should not restrict the court as it takes up another set of regulations that could bind lawyers.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
