One emerging International Trade Commission trend involves the way non-practicing entities have begun to make inroads there — a development likely to gain momentum from an April ruling by the full commission that says, in most cases, merely spending money on litigation qualifies an ITC complainant as a “domestic industry” worthy of protection. The case, Certain Coaxial Cable Connectors, is significant for another reason: It marked the first public battle between Big Tech and NPEs over who deserves to be at the ITC — and Big Tech lost.

The complainant in the case, Syracuse, N.Y.-based PPC, has no U.S. operations that qualify it as a domestic industry under ITC rules. It argued, though, that legal costs it incurred while enforcing its patents in court should earn it domestic industry status, because the suits resulted in a patent license. The full commission agreed to consider the case late last year and sought public comment from interested parties.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]