A split federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a 2008 injunction barring a Kentucky business owner from using the names "Victor's Secret" and "Victor's Little Secret" on an adult novelty and lingerie shop. In a 2-1 vote, the 6th Circuit ruled that, under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act, the use of those names by the Elizabethtown, Ky., business cast an unflattering shadow on the Columbus, Ohio-based chain Victoria's Secret and potentially hurts its business.
May 21, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
If Victor’s got a little secret, he’ll have to keep it to himself.
A split federal appeals court upheld an injunction Wednesday barring a central Kentucky business owner from using the names “Victor’s Secret” and “Victor’s Little Secret” on an adult novelty and lingerie shop.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
