Kids given credit cards tied to their parents' accounts have no right to dispute any charges: That's up to mommy and daddy. That was one scenario raised in a 9th Circuit ruling in a case on credit card billing involving a consumer advocate and so-called "lawsuit gadfly" who sued Wells Fargo over unresolved billing disputes on a credit card he was given by some friends. The court delved into the definitions of "consumer" and "obligor," determining that the plaintiff was the former and not the latter.
May 20, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Kids given credit cards tied to their parents’ accounts have no right to dispute any charges: That’s up to mommy and daddy.
That was one scenario raised Wednesday in a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on credit card billing that otherwise had nothing to do with family interactions.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
