In a hearing to determine whether the Eastern District of Pennsylvania is the appropriate court to decide if Cravath Swaine & Moore should be enjoined from representing Air Products in its bid to acquire Airgas, the judge focused on one party who wasn’t there — Air Products.

In Airgas v. Cravath Swaine & Moore, District Judge Eduardo C. Robreno asked lawyers for both sides whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 regarding joinder of parties required Air Products be a party to a suit that could potentially result in the company having its attorneys of choice being thrown out. The judge did mention Air Products joining the case would ruin diversity of jurisdiction and lead to a dismissal.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]