Southern District of New York Judge Shira A. Scheindlin has issued another blockbuster e-discovery decision that is sure to become required reading for litigants throughout the United States. In Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLC,et al., Scheindlin, author of the five Zubulake decisions pre-dating the e-discovery amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides an analytical framework for litigators to assess their e-discovery performance and judges to calibrate sanctions. 05 Civ. 9016 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2010), Amended Opinion and Order (the “Slip Op.”). Scheindlin christened her decision “Zubulake Revisited: Six Years Later.”

Boiled down to its core, the 85-page opinion suggests a laundry list of do’s and don’ts for litigators handling pre-trial discovery.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]