After more than eight months of speculation, hundreds of attorneys who paid to put their names on a Web site designed to help generate business leads likely won’t face sanctions from ethics officials in Connecticut or any of 46 other states.

A three-person panel of Connecticut’s Statewide Grievance Committee has dismissed the cases of five Connecticut-licensed bankruptcy attorneys whose names were on a Web site run by Chicago-based Total Attorneys. That ruling signaled the end of an ethics battle between Norwich, Conn., bankruptcy attorney Zenas Zelotes and lawyers he claimed were violating Connecticut Practice Book rules by improperly paying money for client referrals.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]