Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld has won an appeal in a dispute with a recruiter that claimed it was owed a placement fee for a lawyer the firm hired in 2006. In an unsigned decision, the Appellate Division, 1st Department, upheld a lower court’s dismissal last year of the suit brought by recruiter Sivin-Tobin Associates.

Sivin-Tobin sued Akin Gump in 2006 for breach of contract and unjust enrichment after a different recruiter received a $227,500 fee for placing Chang-Joo Kim, a Korea specialist then at Dorsey & Whitney. The recruiter claimed it had an implied contract with the law firm when it sent a partner in Akin Gump’s New York office a term sheet and package about Kim. Meanwhile, an Akin Gump partner in Washington, unbeknownst to the partner in New York, received Kim’s resume from a Boston recruiting firm nine days later. The firm said it decided to hire him based on that referral.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]