Defense lawyers in the Yaz mass tort litigation in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court want to ask about the comprehensive history of contraceptive use by plaintiffs alleging that the birth control pills Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella caused them injury. Plaintiffs lawyers are in opposition out of the concern that some plaintiffs will be dissuaded from continuing their lawsuits because of questions that would delve into their sexual history.

A hearing was held Friday on whether the defendants could ask plaintiffs on a litigation questionnaire about any contraceptive methods they have used to prevent pregnancy beyond hormonal birth control methods. The Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella mass tort cases will likely become one of the high-volume programs in Philadelphia’s Complex Litigation Center.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]