The three-year-old controversy over whether New Jersey lawyers can tout their inclusion in Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers or other ratings publications is again before the state Supreme Court. Six lawyers have signed up to speak at a hearing today as the court weighs a proposed easing of Rule of Professional Conduct 7.1, which bans advertising that compares a lawyer's services with others. The revision would allow comparisons if the "basis" for them "can be substantiated."
September 30, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The three-year-old controversy over whether New Jersey lawyers can tout their inclusion in Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers or other ratings publications is again before the state Supreme Court.
Six lawyers have signed up to speak at a hearing today as the court weighs a proposed easing of Rule of Professional Conduct 7.1, which bans advertising that compares a lawyer’s services with others.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
