Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman has been doing its part to keep defense lawyers employed in these hard economic times. For instance, in a case we first wrote about in April, the firm filed a $3 billion suit against a whole slew of banks, including Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, JPMorgan Chase, Barclays and Deutsche Bank, claiming they reneged on loan agreements to fund a revolving credit facility for a multibillion-dollar Las Vegas casino called Fontainebleau.
On Aug. 26, the banks (and their lawyers) got good news. Miami federal district court Judge Alan Gold denied Fontainebleau’s motion for partial summary judgment, as well as its motion for an order requiring the banks to immediately provide $656 million in funding to finish the project. Judge Gold ruled that the banks, not Fontainebleau, correctly read the lending contract at the heart of the case. “Defendants are legally correct in their interpretation of the credit agreement as a matter of law,” Gold wrote. [Hat tip to the Las Vegas Sun.]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]