On Monday, a few hours before jury selection in a high-profile Boston copyright infringement case in which several record companies and the Recording Industry Association of America are suing Massachusetts college students for illegal Internet music downloads, a federal district court judge shot down one of the defense team's key legal theories. The judge wrote that defendant Joel Tenenbaum couldn't cite fair use, the legal use of copyrighted works under certain circumstances, during the trial.
July 28, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A few hours before jury selection in a high-profile Boston copyright infringement case involving music downloading, U.S. District Judge Nancy Gertner shot down one of the defense team’s key legal theories.
In Capital Records Inc. v. Alaujan, several record companies and the Recording Industry Association of America are suing college students in the District of Massachusetts for making illegal Internet music downloads.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
