A federal judge rejected a mistrial motion Monday after dismissing a juror for allegedly making a racist remark during deliberations in a copyright infringement lawsuit that pits the maker of the popular Bratz dolls against toy giant Mattel. Lawyers for MGA Entertainment had argued that the comment could have tainted the jury against the company's CEO, an Iranian immigrant who is Jewish. The judge said the remaining nine jurors seemed unbiased and had openly discussed the remark with the judge.
August 05, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A federal judge rejected a mistrial motion Monday after dismissing a juror for allegedly making a racist remark during deliberations in a copyright infringement lawsuit that pits the maker of the popular Bratz dolls against toy giant Mattel Inc.
Lawyers for MGA Entertainment Inc. had argued that the comment could have tainted the jury against the company’s chief executive officer, an Iranian immigrant who is Jewish.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
