California Supreme Court Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar finds them “very useful.” State 4th District Court of Appeal Justice Barton Gaut thinks they’re mostly a waste of paper. And several other appellate justices believe they’d be a lot better if lawyers put more effort into them.
What’s everyone talking about? Reply briefs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]