When considering whether three high-level Umpqua Bank executives could be shielded from having to appear at deposition in a negligent hiring lawsuit, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously rejected the financial institution’s arguments and encouragement to adopt the so-called “apex doctrine.”

The apex doctrine shields certain high-ranking officials from deposition unless the proponent can show that the witness has “personal knowledge of the facts and that less intrusive means of discovery have been unsuccessful.” But in the case before the state high court, it was an issue for the court to decide whether Washington does or should follow the apex doctrine.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]