Kagan, Jackson Put Down Markers in Major Voting Rights Challenge
"In recent years, this statute has not fared well in this court," Justice Elena Kagan said.
October 04, 2022 at 03:39 PM
5 minute read
Constitutional LawThe original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
What You Need to Know
- The justices heard two hours of argument on Alabama's claim that its 2021 congressional map doesn't violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
- A number of justices seemed skeptical of the state's argument that race neutrality is required in redistricting.
- The state's opponents said there was nothing race-neutral about the state's map.
Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson sent separate shots across the bench to their colleagues Tuesday in which they made clear their views that the Constitution is not colorblind and the court's conservative majority has damaged the Voting Rights Act enough.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 5'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250