An employee’s constitutional challenge to a workers’ compensation claim denial did not convince a Commonwealth Court panel that a statute restricting certain disfigurement loss benefits to injuries of the head, face or neck is invalid.

The claimant, represented by Pond Lehocky Giordano, sought benefits for what she said was severe scarring on her legs as a result of a workplace accident. She argued the limit set forth in Section 306(c)(22) of the Workers’ Compensation Act violates the remedies clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the equal protection principles of both the state and U.S. constitutions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]