The Massachusetts Appeals Court on Tuesday rejected a defendant’s appeal that his trial judge abused his discretion and that the commonwealth’s attorney-directed voir dire questions demonstrated bias among several jury members, court records show.

During Arthur E. Salsbury Jr.’s criminal trial in January 2020, his counsel conducted voir dire and asked prospective jurors if they “agreed with the proposition that although false accusations of sexual assault happen, it’s rare or infrequent,” and if they “believe that if somebody comes forward and … puts themselves through the process of indicating a sexual assault occurred,” that it is “very likely” that person is “telling the truth.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]